Monthly Archives: December 2008

Groups on both sides of the same-sex marriage issue fight to change law in Illinois

By Erica Christoffer

Lauren Hasselson and Christy Fairbairn of Bloomingdale, Ill. know they’re up against a tough fight. The couple, who demonstrated against the approval of California’s Proposition 8 in Downtown Chicago last month, plan to wed May 2 in a commitment ceremony. They want nothing more than their vows to be recognized under Illinois law.

Yet momentum has gained on both sides of this controversial debate since Nov. 4 when three states – Florida, Arizona and California – passed referendums against same-sex marriage.

Protect Marriage Illinois board member Peter LaBarbera said his group would like to see even stronger legislation enacted in Illinois. His group is considering plans for a ballot issue in 2010 to amend the state’s constitution to define marriage between one man and one woman, while state Rep. Greg Harris, an openly gay state legislator from House District 13 on Chicago’s Northside, is working to get his civil unions bill advanced to a floor vote early in 2009.

“What I really hope is the people who became angry when [Proposition 8] passed in California will transfer that anger to political action in Illinois,” Harris said.

Proposition 8, which passed with 52 percent of the vote, reverses a May court ruling that had allowed thousands of couples to wed in California. Gay marriage foes see it as a major victory across the country.

“I think the Proposition 8 protests are arrogant,” said LaBarbera. “The issue was struck down.” He also takes issue with gay activists calling opponents bigots and hateful. “That’s just an insult.”

LaBarbera, who also serves as president of Americans For Truth about Homosexuality, called same-sex marriage “a threat to religions liberty,” saying he fears if it were legalized, churches would eventually be forced to perform same-sex marriages.

Corrine Mina, co-organizer of the Chicago Against Prop 8 rally held in November, said churches need not worry they will be forced to perform any ceremonies.illustration1

“[Gay couples] are not looking for religions groups to marry them,” said Mina. “They’re just looking for the rights married people have. Equal rights is the ultimate goal.”

There are 1,138 benefits, rights and privileges related to marital status, according to the U.S. Government Accountability Office. They include tax breaks, estate rights and government benefits, such as spouses receiving Social Security and Medicare.

“Instead of seeing it as a loss, this has given us a huge window of opportunity,” said Fairbairn, 25.

She speculates that if Proposition 8 had not passed, same-sex marriage would have indeed been legal in California, but the issues would have remained quiet throughout the rest of the country. Now, she says, a fire has been lit under gay activists to fight harder for equal marriage rights, including in Illinois.

In 1996, Congress enacted the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which bars federal recognition of same-sex marriages and allows states to do the same. That same year, the General Assembly changed Illinois law to define marriage between one man and one woman.

Forty-one states currently have Defense of Marriage Acts and 30 states have ratified their constitution to define marriage between one man and one woman, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

In 2006, the Illinois Family Institute and Protect Marriage Illinois tried to get a constitutional referendum against same-sex marriage on the ballot in Illinois, but many of the signatures gathered were thrown out by the State Board of Elections because they were not filed under the correct election jurisdiction. In the end, they were short of the approximately 283,000 signatures required. They tried in 2008 but again fell short on signatures.

“To me, it says for most people in Illinois, this is not a big issue,” Harris said.

Harris originally proposed a same-sex marriage bill – “Marriage Equality Illinois” – early in 2007. But after speaking with each and every one of the House’s 117 other members, Harris expects more support among his General Assembly colleagues for civil unions (H.B. 1826) than for gay marriage.

Countering Harris’ legislation, Rep. David Reis of Jasper County introduced a bill two years ago proposing a constitutional amendment defining marriage between one man and one woman. It hasn’t moved from Rules Committee. “If it comes out of Rules, it will sail through the House,” Harris said.

The tide of same-sex marriage could turn either way in the General Assembly next year, Harris said, but he’s hopeful about his civil unions bill.

Massachusetts and now Connecticut are the only two states in the United States issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples. Rhode Island recognizes same-sex marriages from other states, and Oregon provides nearly all state-level spousal rights to domestic partnerships.

“We’re here to win equal marriage rights right here in Illinois,” said Andy Thayer, co-founder of the Gay Liberation Network, at the Nov. 15 Chicago rally. “Civil rights have never been won by people politely asking for them; they’ve been won by people demanding them.

Fairbairn said, “I think we have a really long way to go before we feel there is real progress made. Ultimately, the goal is to be legal across the country. But baby steps – there has to be compromise from both sides. Maybe county-by-county, maybe that’s where it has to start.”

Hasselson, who popped the question to Fairbairn on Jan. 22, her 25th birthday, hid the custom ring set with diamonds from her grandmother’s necklace and stones from Fairbairn’s mother’s original wedding band, in a bag of Fairbairn’s favorite treat – gummy bears.

“I pulled it out, and I held it there for a second. I said, ‘Are you serious?’” Fairbairn recounted of the proposal. Hasselson replied with, “I want to be with you forever.” The couple is in the midst of planning a ceremony and reception with 130 guests.

“I tell myself its cool, I don’t need a piece of paper to prove my love,” said Hasselson. “But when I discuss it with others, it’s hard; I’m not, but I am [getting married].”

Obama and the Arab World

By Erica Christoffer

President-elect Barack Obama is at a crossroads with the Arab World.

On the one hand, he could continue implementing policies of the Bush Administration and hold his tongue in speaking out against demonizing comments made towards Muslims. But on the other hand, he could follow through with his campaign promises to open up lines of communication and enact policies that would improve relations between the Middle East and the United States.

The Muslim community is hoping for the latter.

Experts point to three main areas – creating dialogue with Iran, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and the war in Iraq – which must be addressed to gain ground in the Middle East.

“If the problems of the Middle East, Israel-Palestine, the stand-off with Iran, the deadlock with Syria, if they are not addressed they will continue to fester and the region will continue to be a breeding ground for extremism that could be directed toward America,” said Liz Sly, Chicago Tribune’s Middle East correspondent based in Beirut.

Sly said in order for the U.S. to restore its image in the Arab World, progress must be made on the peace process between Israel and the Palestinians.

The goal to achieve a Palestinian state that can peacefully co-exist with Israel is one Obama said he hopes to progress.

“The Israeli-Palestinian conflict tends to be the barometer of Middle East-U.S. relations. If he’s willing to talk to people on the other side of the conflict, that would help,” said Berkeley political science professor Darren Zook.

Wajahat Ali, a Muslim-American commentary writer from Fremont, Calif. who penned the play “The Domestic Crusaders,” said the United States’ unquestioning support of Israel is holding back the peace process. He is not convinced Obama will make any major changes to that policy, however hopeful in that Obama has acknowledged the suffering of Palestinians and is open to discussion.

“Out of all the president, he could bring about change,” Ali said.

Zook characterized the Middle East perception of Obama as “hopeful but uneasy,” especially regarding Obama’s position on Israel-Palestine. “There’s a sense of, ‘what’s really going to change here?’”

Yet signs of change between the U.S. and the 16 countries of the Middle East are already evident, Iranian-born journalist Saideh Jamshidi from Free Speech Radio News pointed out.

For the first time in the history of the United States presidency, in the president of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, congratulated Barack Obama on his victory. “I think it’s a sign,” Jamshidi said.

Iran will be holding elections in June 2009, where the reform party will be challenging the conservative party currently in power. Ahmadinejad, she said, will run again, but winning is not guaranteed.

“[Iranians] have lost public opinion for that the party has done and what they have said,” Jamshidi said, eager to learn who his opponent will be. “The Iranian people would like to normalize their relationship with the United States.”

Yet she does not think Iran would give up its nuclear development project if the U.S. demands it.

“For Iran, the nuclear power has become a national identity and you do not give up on that,” Jamshidi said. “The speculation of putting down this agenda is very unlikely.”

But neither country will be able to move forward in the region without talking to each other, she said, especially regarding Iraq. Iranians want to stabilize the country, she said. And Iran, which shares long borders with Iraq, is a regional power in both business, military, which could make a difference of Iraq. If they do not open the lines of communication, Iraq will remain in chaos and the United States’ image will continue to suffer throughout the Middle East, Jamshidi said.

As’ad AbuKhalil, political science professor at California State University, Stanislaus, is not as optimistic that Obama’s “change” will come to the Middle East. Nor does he think the Arab World’s “festive” mood, prevalent in the wake of Obama’s election, will last. He believes Obama will provide an “intelligent continuation of the Bush Administration.” The war in Iraq will not end as soon as promised and the U.S. may surge in Afghanistan, he said.

At home, Muslim-Americans are also keeping a keen eye on these issues.

“Bush with his wars and policies and statements has pushed Arab-Americans into the arms of the Democratic Party,” AbuKhalil said.

Yet amid the election frenzy, lines were crossed that depict prejudices still prevalent in America. Arab-Americans took issue with Obama’s refused to vocally condemn those who called him Arab and Muslim with negative connotation. He did not go as far as former Secretary of State Colin Powell, who said on Meet the Press, “Is there something wrong with being a Muslim in this country? The answer is no. That’s not America.”

Attention was also drawn pre-election to Obama’s relationship with Rashid Khalidi, Palestinian-American professor and director of the Middle East Institute of Columbia University’s School of International Public Affairs. AbuKhalil, who studied under Khalidi in Beirut, was disappointed that Obama never came to his defense.

Khalidi was demonized, said Ali. In a commentary piece he wrote for the Guardian, Ali said, “There is something fundamentally ‘un-American’ about wearing the contemporary Scarlet Letter: Muslim.”

Education is the main issue the social climate is unfavorable to Muslims, said Amina Sharif, Communications coordinator for the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) in Chicago. From a young age growing up in a small town in southern Illinois Sharif noticed a naivety and lack of knowledge amongst those in her community about Muslims and Arabs.

“A lot of Americans don’t realize they have Muslim neighbors,” she said.

Obama, she said, has the opportunity to change this by drawing attention to issues such as racial and ethnic profiling.

“If our government sets the tone for a more open minded, a more tolerant, and accepting American society, then that will transition down to the whole country,” Sharif said.

But Obama’s various promises to groups in America and abroad, begs the question whether he can meet everyone’s needs.

“He has to be an even broker and that’s something that has lacked from previous administration,” Sharif said. “I am really concerned because he is making promises to everybody. I can’t tell right now with his transition team if he’s going to be that champion for peace or if he is going to be more middle of the road.”

Good bedtime reading.

Having trouble sleeping? Here’s a spooky story to help you sleep… or not sleep. It gets really good between pages 45-60.

Fighting corruption is hot.

I have to admit, I kinda have a crush on Patrick Fitzgerald.

Fitzgerald Profile

(AP photo)

Blagojevich, Blagojevich.

Blagojevich as a noun: “It’s Bring Your Blagojevich to Work Day tomorrow.”
Blagojevich as a verb: “The cat Blagojeviched on the floor.”
Blagojevich as an adjective: “Are you offering me money? How Blagojevich of you.”
Blagojevich as all three: “I’m so Blagojeviching Blagojevich about Blagojevich.”

I’ll tell you something, Illinois politics is not boring, that’s for sure.

blago